Space Pen, μολύβια και άλλες “έξυπνες” λύσεις

Ξεκινάς το άρθρο σου γράφοντας:

Λ​​έγεται ότι όταν πρωτοπήγαν οι αστροναύτες στο Διάστημα, διαπίστωσαν ότι δεν μπορούσαν να γράφουν με τα στιλό διαρκείας λόγω της έλλειψης της βαρύτητας […] Οι Αμερικανοί, ύστερα από έρευνες που κοστίσαν πολλά εκατομμύρια δολάρια, κατασκεύασαν ένα στιλό με εσωτερική πίεση που μπορούσε να γράφει κάτω από οποιεσδήποτε συνθήκες, ακόμα και στο Διάστημα. Οι Ρώσοι, όταν διαπίστωσαν ότι έχουν το ίδιο πρόβλημα, εφοδίασαν τους αστροναύτες τους με μολύβια

Το στυλό της ιστορίας είναι το Space Pen. Το πρόβλημα της ιστορίας είναι πως “οι Αμερικάνοι” (η NASA στη συνήθη εκδοχή) του μύθου δεν επένδυσαν σε αυτό εκατομμύρια δολάρια ποτέ. Και αυτοί μολύβια χρησιμοποίησαν στην αρχή και όταν o Fisher έφτιαξε το space pen, το χρησιμοποίησαν τόσο οι Αμερικάνοι όσο και οι Ρώσοι. Δε χρειάζεται να ξέρεις πως οι Πολεμικές Αεροπορίες ήταν οι πρώτοι που έκαναν μεγάλες παραγγελίες για ballpoint pens ώστε να καταλαβαίνεις πως το μολύβι δεν είναι η έξυπνη λύση στο πρόβλημα γραφής σε αντίξοες συνθήκες. Γιατί να χρειάζεται άλλωστε όταν γράφεις:

Δεν γνωρίζω αν η ιστορία είναι αληθινή ή κατασκεύασμα του Ψυχρού Πολέμου

Γράφεις άρθρα επί άρθρων για τη βελτίωση της Πληροφορικής (και των διαδικασιών) στο Δημόσιο Τομέα και έχεις διοικήσει μια από τις εταιρίες που διαμόρφωσαν την αγορά Πληροφορικής στη Χώρα. Πως να μπορέσεις σήμερα να βρεις εάν η ιστορία ευσταθεί ή όχι; Ειδικά όταν σου χαλάει το δίδαγμα;

Και το ερώτημα είναι: Εάν η πρώτη σου παράγραφος ξεκινάει με μπαρούφες, γιατί πρέπει να δώσω σημασία στο υπόλοιπο άρθρο;

Ah the feedback loop …

And modelers rarely if ever consider the feedback loop and the ramifications of their predatory models on our culture.

This does not happen with modelers only. It happens with everyone that has a “good idea” and rushes it forward without really thinking whether it will work or not, and how long afterwards we are going to see how what was introduced interferes with what was already there, fine tuned and working. And that is why I read about cybernetics; not because it is less obscure, or more useful than people think, but because it always reminds me of the feedback loop.

investigators are part of the system
investigators are part of the system

Homeostasis from a sysadmin perspective.

2nd ISACA Athens Chapter Conference

Yesterday I attended the 2nd ISACA Athens Chapter Conference. Time and money did not permit attending the workshop the day before, but I heard it was a great success. So here are some of the highlights:

Paul Spirakis talked about “Trust in the Web”. His talk followed closely the spirit of “Reflections on Trusting Trust” with a bit of mathematics and more time at his disposal. He concluded with a metatheorem (a conjecture really) that we cannot achieve perfect trust in the web and in his line of thought this closely resembles Arrow’s Impossibility Theorem. In my mind and following the same path of thought, this is not similar to Arrow’s theorem, but more closely to the Good Regulator which also depicts the complexity needed in order to achieve this.

Spirakis’s talk made me think that we System Administrators love to say that trust is not transitive, or as my good friend George loves to recite “I trust my friend who trusts the President; do I trust the President?”. And yet, although we say this thing like we believe it, at the same time we demand using protocols that depend on PKI or other third part infrastructure all the time. And we feel good about this and our users do not complain since their browser (who also trusts a set of third parties) does not complain too. The truth is that trust decays upon transition. We trust someone to a degree of certainty (which can be absolute) but when we introduce that someone to a third person, a lower degree comes along with the introduction. Why? Because it is always possible that the person we introduced do something we did not expect. The person accepting the introduction, accepts it with even less certainty that we do (yes they may accept our word blindly, so multiply by one in this case) and the two newly introduced parties work their trust from there. So given time, trust either builds up or dies out. But I digressed long enough.

@kpapapan (Greek OWASP chapter leader) presented the idea where bugs in code are debt waiting to be paid later. I had never considered this point of view and I liked it very much. I surely hope he can have the opportunity to present again the subject this time with the aid of numbers from a real software project that costs money to develop and support. I sure hope that there can be one or two software vendors that can provide him the numbers to support the “bugs as debt” point of view. It would help project managers deciding realistic deadlines.

This was part of a “20 slides in 20 seconds” track where George Raikos gave an excellent presentation based on the “Ginetai” (it can be done) rebranding strategy for Greece. I am opposed to “Ginetai” but I have to acknowledge excellence even to stuff that I do not agree with. In the same session there were also two presentations from the ISACA Athens Chapter board members thanks to which I learned that in Greece there exist 192 CISAs, 71 CISMs, 24 CGEITs and 52 CRISCs. That was Friday. Saturday was ISACA test day, so I am guessing these numbers will grow.

The best presentation in the room was given by Ramses Gallego. Forget all he spoke about going beyond identity management and towards access governance. The man asked the audience the Drucker question:

If you were outside the industry that you are in now and you had all the information that you have now, would you join it?

– If not run away; otherwise embrace the field.

Pretty generic, but that is what you take away from impressive speakers. Stuff that can be applied in multiple cases. Closer to home Ramses also insisted on asking the right questions (about access) at the right time. Because this gives you control of the world that you are supposed to be managing: Who? What? When? Where? Why? How?

And of course there was the “hallway track”. Usually the most important part of a conference. I did not have the chance to talk to a lot of people but really exchanged a few ideas with some, triggered mostly by what was presented. Even though it may be unconscious to many of the attendees, they are employing a systems approach on the (well) systems that they manage. To that end a bit of studying system dynamics is needed, since it will enrich the view we have on the behaviour of the systems (people, machines, processes and information) that we manage. The hallway track is always the best part of the conference and this time I left with a whole lot of pointers for stuff to look up.

There were four or five people tweeting from the conference, less than 3% of the attendees. That was bad. I would have loved to see what others made of the presentations while they were being given.

Congratulations to the ISACA Athens Chapter board members for organising what seems to be a conference that will last many years. Congratulations to them also for making it possible for unemployed members of the Chapter to attend free of charge.

Ηλεκτρονικές εκλογές και ηλικία

49 καθηγητές του ΕΜΠ ισχυρίζονται πως (ανάμεσα σε άλλα) οι ηλεκτρονικές εκλογές εμποδίζουν τα μέλη ΔΕΠ που δεν είναι εξοικειωμένα με την τεχνολογία να ψηφίσουν. Μου θύμισαν δύο παλιές ιστορίες:

Ιστορία 1η:

Ένα βράδυ όταν είχα πρωτοξεκινήσει να δουλεύω στο ΤΕΕ μπήκε στο γραφείο ο τότε πρόεδρος των συνταξιούχων Μηχανικών, ετών 92. Στο χέρι του είχε μια σακούλα με μια κάρτα ήχου και ένα CD και μας είπε:

– Παιδιά, πήγα και πήρα αυτά από το Πλαίσιο. Μου δείχνετε πως να τα συνδέσω στον υπολογιστή μου;

Πως να τα συνδέσω. Όχι αν μπορείτε να μου τα συνδέσετε εσείς.

Ιστορία 2η:

Κάποτε όταν ακόμα δούλευα στο NTUA-NOC, τόλμησα να πω πως αρκετοί Καθηγητές επειδή είναι μεγάλοι σε ηλικία ίσως να έχουν πρόβλημα προσαρμογής στο να δουλεύουν με το Internet (και μέσω web ειδικότερα). Από τις αντιδράσεις (“είπαμε είμαστε γέροι, αλλά όχι κι έτσι” η πιο ήπια, μέχρι να κληθώ σε κάποιο είδος απολογίας η σκληρότερη) θα έλεγε κανείς πως μάλλον προσέβαλλα το σύνολο των μελών ΔΕΠ εκείνης της περιόδου.

Δεν θα έγραφα τις ιστορίες αυτές, εάν τουλάχιστον ένας από τους φερόμενους ως υπογράφοντες αυτό το επιχείρημα δεν ήταν ο ίδιος high tech user που την μόνη φορά που “ζορίστηκε” ήταν όταν του έδωσα να διαβάσει το βιβλίο του sendmail.

How to teach a 4 year-old child geometry

Kirsti Määttänen on PEIRCE-L:

Jerry, list,

I’ll explain to you how to teach some basics of geometry to a 4 year old. – My grand-son is now 4 years 2 moths, I just a while ago taught him. 4 years is excellent age for these studies, perhaps the very best.

You’ll need either a chalk-board or a white plane with a peg in the middle. Then you’ll need a string and a chalk or a pencil. Then you’ll have to make a tiny groove to the peg, as well as one to the chalk, or the pencil. – Best if the distance of the groove from the plane is about the same in the peg and in the chalk/pencil.

Then you tie one end of the string to the peg, and the other to the chalk or pencil. Make sure the ties hold and that the length of the string is not too long. – If you use a pencil, it should be B 6 (quite soft, the kind artists use).

Then show the child how to keep the string straight, as long as possible, that is. Then instruct him/her to move the chalk/pencil to draw on the plane. – Then, like a miracle, a circle is being drawn.

It is a true miracle to the child. – The child will soon learn that a really fine and even circle will only be formed IF the string is kept tense, stretched to the utmost.

By now you have DEMONSTRATED the nature of a circle to the child. Now he/she understands the SOUL (as topologist say) of a circle.

Then use various lengths of the string – and you get a set of concentric circles. – And the child’s understanding gets deeper.

Children of this age get really enthusiastic. – My grandson Mikko was jumping and shouting: I drew a CIRCLE, I can make a CIRCLE!!! A FINE circle!!!

Now you have a great opportunity to discuss all you have done together. The child will absorb all the information like a sponge absorbs water.

But this is not all. Now the child is ready to understand the functions a pair of compasses. – That it has to be stiff, with a joint in the upper end. And with a sharp spike in the other end, as well as a piece of lead in the other end.
Then take a paper-block, and let the child draw various kinds of circles on the paper. – Some of them overlapping each other. – You’ll get various Venn’s diagrams to discuss.

Make sure that you pace these demonstrations and discussion in accord to the child’s enthusiasm and interest. – With the first signs of slackening attention, stop and tell the child that you continue some other day. (My grandsons are both BDM Baby Dance children, so they both have exceptionally long attention spans & are quite skillful.)

Then take an A4 sheet of paper and draw as big a circle as you can on the sheet. – Then two points of the circle will touch the edge of the paper (if you have measured it’s shorter side & chosen a middle point as the center of the circle).

Then take the pair of compasses, taking care not to change it’s angle (which you point out to the child), and put the spike on any point on the circumference of the circle. Then mark two points on the circumference, one to one direction, one to the other direction.

Then take a ruler and draw lines connecting the two marks + the little hole left by the spike. – Now you have got an equilateral triangle inside the circle.

Then cut the circle out of the sheep of paper. – Then fold the paper according to the lines drawn with the ruler.
– Then you’ll have a triangle AND a circle. – When flat, it is a circle, when folded, it is a triangle with “wings”.

This, too, is for the child a miracle. – My grandson Mikko absolutely wanted to save this miracle. And he spoke for days to come, that granny made a triangle out of a circle.

You may then point out that all the “wings” are of equal size. – By this time you have had lots of opportunities to demonstrate “equal” and “unequal” to the child. – Also “more” and “less”. Etc., etc.

The next phase, where you go from plane geometry to three-dimensional geometry I have not yet done with my grandson.

For that you need these Japanese Origami papers in various colors, in order to get the most of it.

First, choose a selection of the biggest sheets, with a variety of colors. – You also need a pair of compasses, a ruler, scissors and glue. And a pencil, of course.

Then make, according to the rules above, a set of these triangles with “wings”.

Then start gluing them together, two wings at a time first. – Now establish a rule: the two “wings” to be glued together must always be of different colors. – Let the child choose the colors. – Do not, however, take a new color if it is not needed because of the rule.

When the glue holds, show the child that a third triangle with “wings” can be attached to the former two by two of their “wings”. – Remember the rule about colors!

The idea of a curved space begins now to show itself.

You then continue, and in the end you will have a Platonic Solid, the Octahedron. – The “wings” are there to remind the child that you started with circles. – Also, you may point out to the child that an imaginary sphere, a bigger one may be thought – around the one formed out of triangles. This imaginary sphere is determined by the “highest points” of the wings. – There is the idea of concentric spheres demonstrated.

You may also dwell on the idea of determination. (You may need a little practicing to learn to speak so that a child can understand what you mean. One of the benefits for you yourself is that by learning to do so, you simultaneously learn to understand yourself. – Not a small benefit, I assure you!)

Now you can put a lamp inside, so you get a multicolored lamp shade, preferably hanging from the ceiling.
This is ideal for the child (as well as for you) to meditate on. – It works miracles on geometrical imagination!

Note that you have here introduced the basics of the famous map-coloring problem as one side-product (one amongst many).

Then all you need to do is to nourish your child’s geometrical imagination – and mathematical in general – from time to time — and just wait for your little genius to grow and prosper!

If you happen to feel a shortage of geometrical imagination to nourish that of your child’s, then just take up Euclid’s Elements to enliven it.

Cheers,

Kirsti